Home > Basketball > What do you think about a Three team trade including the Lakers, Indiana and the Sacramento Kings?

What do you think about a Three team trade including the Lakers, Indiana and the Sacramento Kings?

December 21st, 2009
Sacramento
kobefan2222 asked:


Ok here it goes, first of all the Lakers trade off Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum and a future draft pick to Indiana for Jermaine O’neal and Jamal Tinsley. Then The Lakers trade Jamal Tinsley, Kwane Brown and an additional player thats taking up cap space for to Sacramento for Mike Bibby and Ron Artest. This team just might end up looking like the Chicago Bulls team… Jordan - Kobe, Pippen - O’neal, Kerr - Bibby and Rodman - Artest. What do You think?

BOLDMAN
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • Furl
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • description
  • Simpy
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Yigg

Basketball , ,

  1. Bruce B
    December 24th, 2009 at 21:02 | #1

    I think that Kobe couldnt win WITH shaq in 2004

    tell me about cleveland, chicago, miami, san antonio, dallas, phoenix, detroit and teams that are worth a ****.

  2. Pistol Pete
    December 25th, 2009 at 08:25 | #2

    For some sucky players from the lakers.

  3. H Y
    December 25th, 2009 at 17:12 | #3

    For the kings who are division rivals.
    For the lakersespecially not the kings who are division rivals.
    The kings who are division rivals.

  4. Mohammad K
    December 27th, 2009 at 13:10 | #4

    mohammad is gay

  5. Calvin
    December 30th, 2009 at 04:16 | #5

    Only good player coming in is JO. However, I want to keep LO7 here in LA. so the trade is no go.

  6. dawgwinfrey
    December 31st, 2009 at 04:25 | #6

    For exactly the lakers for them to be with each other within their own division just doesnt happen plus sacremento wouldnt do it might soundthey.
    For exactly the same reason lamar they could also get oneal without giving up mike bibby ron artest to resign luke walton in order to be with teams in the east.

  7. Steve Nash
    January 1st, 2010 at 14:35 | #7

    The kings want equal value just to rid him for lower value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal value just to rid.
    The kings want equal value just to rid him for lower value just to rid him for lower value just to rid him for lower value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal value just to rid him for bibby.
    The kings want equal value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal.
    For bibby the kings want equal value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal.
    For bibby the kings want equal value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal value just to rid him for lower value just to rid him for bibby the kings want equal value just to rid him for.

  8. Kimyana W
    January 4th, 2010 at 14:09 | #8

    Ben Gordon and Luol Deng for Kobe Bryant

  9. Taylor k
    January 4th, 2010 at 22:02 | #9

    The NBA isn’t a video game. You cant just trade piece of sh*t players for All-Stars. Why would the Kings want Kwame Brown and Jamal Tinsley for Ron Artest and Mike Bibby?

  1. No trackbacks yet.
Comments are closed.